Here's what others have got to say:
Samuel Sokol , JPost: New Balad MK praises Iran's nuke quest
Arutz Sheva: Arab MK Welcomes Iranian Nuclear Weapon
Islam in Action: Israel:Arab Politician Support Iran's Nuke Program
Esser Agaroth: New Balad MK Praises Iran's Nuke Quest
Huffington Post: Haneen Zuabi, New Arab-Israeli Knesset Member, Praises Iranian Nuclear Ambitions
Jewlicious: Freedom of Speech or Sedition?
Daniel Pipes: Iran's Representative in the Knesset - Haneen Zuabi
Some of her comments, according to Samuel Sokol in the Jerusalem Post:
The very concept of a Jewish state is "inherently racist." Israel must be turned into a "state of all its citizens," eliminating its Jewish or Zionist nature.
Iran's role in Palestinian affairs is "more useful" than that of regimes like Jordan and Egypt, in that Iran stands more firmly "against occupation than a lot of the Arab countries." Egypt and Jordan, indeed, are scared of a free and democratic Palestinian state.
It's not a good idea for Israel to be the region's sole nuclear power. "It would be more supporting me to have a [nuclear] counter-power to Israel. I need something to balance [its] power."
Is she worrying about Tehran getting close to acquiring a nuclear weapon? "No, I am not." To the contrary, said is "more afraid from the Israeli nuclear [weapons]."
Would the Israel Defense Forces use nuclear weapons? "The Israelis? I think yes. And I am afraid from real risk rather than from potential risk." More broadly, whereas the Iranian bomb is only "a potential" threat, the IDF is an actual danger. "Every day the Israeli [army] uses its violence, army violence."
Israel is an aggressor state, so only something along the lines of Mutually Assured Destruction would restrain it.
Would an Iranian bomb make Washington nervous, lead to more U.S. pressure on Israel, and that would be good thing? "Exactly."